.
Gordon McFarlane
- Original Message -
From: "Sky Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: 78 RPM to Newer Format
> Hi Matthew, I agree with you on this subject. Yes the old grammerphon
If you like, I could do them for you.
Contact me off-list, and we can discuss it.
---
Dale E. Heltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Bolduc
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 1:24 AM
> To: PC Audio Users
> Sub
Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary G Schindler
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 9:52 AM
> To: PC audio discussion list.
> Subject: Re: 78 RPM to Newer Format
>
> Hello Paul, you need to record the 78 rpm records with a 33
> 1
ssage -
From: "Matthew Bullis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: 78 RPM to Newer Format
> Hello, well I guess that will work for personal use, but the friction of
> the
> needle at t
I'm getting a Old fashend grammerphone soon.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Bullis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: 78 RPM to Newer Format
> Hello, well I guess that w
Hello Paul, you need to record the 78 rpm records with a 33 1/3 turntable. then
use a program like sound Forge to adjust the playback sampling rate to 51.9.
then
use a noise reduction package to clean up the recordings. I hope this is going
to
help.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul B
