eed UDP) forwarded through to Box B.
On the outgoing INVITE packets that I've captured, the "Message Header"
section seems to be mostly correct. Here's what that looks like:
> INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP (externalIP):5060;branch=foobarbaz
> Via:
Aymeric Moizard wrote:
> I suggest you to use ser or sipproxd which have capability
> to resolv NAT issue probably much better than partysip.
Oh, okay. I had read some things online which seemed to indicate
that partysip was the best choice for something like this. I'll
go give one of those a tr
Aymeric Moizard wrote:
> I suggest you to use ser or sipproxd which have capability
> to resolv NAT issue probably much better than partysip.
This will go a little OT here, but I think it'll be useful to anyone
who's searching around the web for similar reasons, so this way it'll
get into the thre
