On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Renan Valieris wrote:
> I caught the difference as well, looks like the only files changed were:
:
>> On Jan 23, 2018 8:51 AM, "Tobias Geerinckx-Rice" wrote:
:
>> While I was merrily updating the parallel package in GNU Guix, the
>> tarball's hash and contents cha
Hi,
I'm writing a tool that will make a tarball, and then the tarball is
passed to parallel, which splits it into 5GB blocks, and each block is
sent to separate pipe.
Call looks like:
tar cf - /some/directory | parallel -j 5 --pipe --block 5G --recend ''
./handle-single-part.sh "{#}"
Where hand
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 11:26:24AM -0500, Joe Sapp wrote:
> Hi depesz,
>
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:33 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
> wrote:
> [snip]
> > But it looks that parallel itself is consumming HUGE amount of memory
> > - comparable with size of /some/directory itself.
> >
> > Server t
Hi depesz,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:33 AM, hubert depesz lubaczewski
wrote:
[snip]
> But it looks that parallel itself is consumming HUGE amount of memory
> - comparable with size of /some/directory itself.
>
> Server that I run it on has 64GB of ram, and the script gets killed
> after ~ 3 minu
> Ha! Here I naïvely thought thought that I could update the release
> without anyone knowing, since I had not sent out a release email yet.
> I never expected anyone would download the file without a release email.
actually, I didn't download anything before your email.
but it seems the mirror I
