Does --line-buffer affects performance penalty mentioned in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/parallel/2017-06/msg9.html ?
> Dnia 22 sierpień 2017 o 00:28 Ole Tange napisał(a):
>
>
> GNU Parallel 20170822 ('Barcelona') has been released. It is available
&
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Hubert Kowalski wrote:
> Does --line-buffer affects performance penalty mentioned in
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/parallel/2017-06/msg9.html ?
Nope. As soon as you combine --line-buffer with something that
requires a file to be written (such as --resu
I wasn't on the list at the time, so I couldn't chip in, but any change that
would result in performance increase would be good.
For that particular case I'd propose default behaviour to be totally quiet,
outpiting file names to be hidden behind --files or similar switch and
outputing full outp
Hello everybody,
I believe that I found a (minor) bug, so I report it here.
When using parallel with the --bar option, everything looks fine.
However, when using the '-m' flag (which allows each command to
process several arguments) the progress bar counts only *one* job
processed for every comma
