On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Sattler
wrote:
> Even so I'm still unhappy with the idea of "one separate
> ssh login per job". How about letting parallel doing the
> multiplexing on its own, running a shell or perl on the
> remote host to spawn the jobs?
I do not see how that would be po
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Sattler
wrote:
>> I would like to have people test the idea before I implement
>> it. I need your help with the options:
>>
>> ssh <> server sleep 1000 &
>> sleep 3 # To make sure the above is logged in and set up
>> seq 1000 | parallel -j0 ssh <> s
