В Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:45:27 +1000
Andrew Beekhof пишет:
> >
> > It statically assigns priorities to cluster nodes. I need to
> > dynamically assign higher priority (lower delay) to a node that is
> > currently running application to ensure that application survives. It
> > was relatively easy in
I have two node cluster with single master/slave resource (replicated
database) using pacemaker+openais on SLES11 SP3 (pacemaker
1.1.11-3ca8c3b). I hit weird situation that I did not see before, and
I cannot really understand it. Assuming master runs on node A and
slave runs on node B. If I stop cl
ink
explains dependencies between two cloned resources. I have single
cloned resource, without any external dependency. I'm afraid I miss how
interleave helps here.
Thank you!
> 2014-09-28 9:56 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
> > I have two node cluster with single master/slave resource (repl
Is it possible to display values for all resource properties,
including those set to default values? cibadmin or "crm configure
show" display only explicitly set properties, and crm_resource or "crm
resource meta" work with single property only. Ideally I'd like to get
actual values of all resource
According to documentation (Pacemaker 1.1.x explained) "when
[Master/Slave] the resource is started, it must come up in the
mode called Slave". But what I observe here - in some cases pacemaker
treats Slave state as error. As example (pacemaker 1.1.9):
Oct 2 13:23:34 cn1 pengine[9446]: notice:
stexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/interleaving-pacemaker-clones
>
> 2014-09-28 9:56 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
>> I have two node cluster with single master/slave resource (replicated
>> database) using pacemaker+openais on SLES11 SP3 (pacemaker
>> 1.1.11-3ca8c3b). I hit w
mmy...
* Your agent does not support the notify action (optional)
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/test/Dummy passed all tests
cn1:/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d #
>
>
>
> 2014-10-02 12:02 GMT+02:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
>> According to documentation (Pacemaker 1.1.x explained) "when
>> [Maste
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Digimer wrote:
> If stonith was configured, after the time out, the first node would fence
> the second node ("unable to reach" != "off").
>
> Alternatively, you can set corosync to 'wait_for_all' and have the first
> node do nothing until it sees the peer.
>
Am I
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:22:35PM +0400, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> Is it possible to display values for all resource properties,
>> including those set to default values?
>
> What do you cons
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Саша Александров wrote:
> Andrei,
>
> I suspect that you think in a way 'if there is a default monitor
> interval value of 60s monitor operation should occur every 60
> seconds', correct?
>
Somewhere in this direction, yes, but not limited to operations.
> Well, t
The primary goal is to transparently update software in cluster. I
just did HA suite update using simple RPM and observed that RPM
attempts to restart stack (rcopenais try-restart). So
a) if it worked, it would mean resources had been migrated from this
node - interruption
b) it did not work - ap
В Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:06:28 +0200
Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
>
> Do you have any specific meta attributes in mind? Taking a
> cursory look doesn't reveal anything very interesting.
>
I was recently bitten by "interleave". Having not much experience so
far, I do not know if there are more attribu
В Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:27:49 -0400
Digimer пишет:
> On 06/10/14 02:11 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Digimer wrote:
> >> If stonith was configured, after the time out, the first node would fence
> >> the second node
Pacemaker 1.1.11. I see in engine logs that it is going to restart resource:
Oct 21 12:34:50 n2 pengine[19748]: notice: LogActions: Restart
rsc_SAPHana_HDB_HDB00:0 (Master n2)
But I never see actual stop/start action being executed and in summary I get
Oct 21 12:35:11 n2 crmd[19749]: notice:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 21 Oct 2014, at 11:15 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>> Pacemaker 1.1.11. I see in engine logs that it is going to restart resource:
>>
>> Oct 21 12:34:50 n2 pengine[19748]: notice: LogActions: R
В Thu, 23 Oct 2014 13:46:00 +0200
Carsten Otto пишет:
> Dear all,
>
> I did not get any response so far. Could you please find the time and
> tell me how the "meta failure-timeout" is supposed to work, in
> combination with monitor operations?
>
If you attach unedited logs from the point of th
В Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:51:24 +0200
Vincenzo Pii пишет:
> I am trying to run the IPaddr resource agent on an active/passive cluster
> on Illumos nodes (pacemaker, corosync, crm... built from updated sources).
>
> By reading the example from Saso here
> http://zfs-create.blogspot.ch/2013/06/buildin
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Sékine Coulibaly wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Yep, forgot the attachments. I did reproduce the issue, please find
> the bz2 files attached. Please tell if you need hb_report being used.
>
You forgot to attach log matching these files.
_
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 16 Oct 2014, at 9:31 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>> The primary goal is to transparently update software in cluster. I
>> just did HA suite update using simple RPM and observed that RPM
>> attempt
В Sat, 25 Oct 2014 23:34:54 +0300
Andrew пишет:
> 25.10.2014 22:34, Digimer пишет:
> > On 25/10/14 03:32 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >> Hi all.
> >>
> >> I use Percona as RA on cluster (nothing mission-critical, currently -
> >> just zabbix data); today after restarting MySQL resource (crm resource
> >>
В Sun, 26 Oct 2014 10:51:13 +0200
Andrew пишет:
> 26.10.2014 08:32, Andrei Borzenkov пишет:
> > В Sat, 25 Oct 2014 23:34:54 +0300
> > Andrew пишет:
> >
> >> 25.10.2014 22:34, Digimer пишет:
> >>> On 25/10/14 03:32 PM, Andrew wrote:
> >>>
В Sun, 26 Oct 2014 12:01:03 +0100
Vladimir пишет:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 19:11:02 -0400
> Digimer wrote:
>
> > On 25/10/14 06:35 PM, Vladimir wrote:
> > > On Sat, 25 Oct 2014 17:30:07 -0400
> > > Digimer wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 25/10/14 05:09 PM, Vladimir wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> curre
В Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:09:08 +1100
Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
> > On 25 Oct 2014, at 12:38 am, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 16 Oct 2014, at 9:31 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 27 Oct 2014, at 2:30 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>> В Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:09:08 +1100
>> Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>>
>>>
>>>> On 25 Oct 2014, at 12:38 am, Andrei Borzenkov wr
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 4:34 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 21 Oct 2014, at 11:15 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>>>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 27 Oct 2014, at 7:36 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 4:34 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>>>>
В Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:31:17 +1100
Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
> > On 28 Oct 2014, at 7:36 am, Neale Ferguson wrote:
> >
> > I am getting loads of these types of messages in syslog:
> >
> > Oct 27 16:23:47 rh7cn1 systemd: pacemaker.service: Got notification
> > message from PID 43007, but receptio
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Ariel S wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to understand how this STONITH works.
>
> I have 2 VMware VMs (moon1a, moon1b) on two different hosts. Each have 2 nic
> assigned: eth0 for heartbeat while eth1 used for everything else.
>
> This is my testing configuration:
I observe strange behavior that I cannot understand. Pacemaker 1.1.11-3ca8c3b.
There is master/slave resource running. Maintenance-mode was set,
pacemaker restarted, maintenance-mode reset. This specific RA returns
Slave instead of Master for the first probe. But what happens later is
rather stran
В Thu, 30 Oct 2014 08:32:24 +1100
Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
> > On 29 Oct 2014, at 10:01 pm, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> >
> > I observe strange behavior that I cannot understand. Pacemaker
> > 1.1.11-3ca8c3b.
> >
> > There is master/slave res
В Sun, 2 Nov 2014 10:01:59 +
Alex Samad - Yieldbroker пишет:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Digimer [mailto:li...@alteeve.ca]
> > Sent: Sunday, 2 November 2014 9:49 AM
> > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] stonith q
> >
> > On 01/11/14 06
er
> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] stonith q
> >
> > On 02/11/14 06:45 AM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > > В Sun, 2 Nov 2014 10:01:59 +
> > > Alex Samad - Yieldbroker пишет:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> -Original Mes
В Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:32:45 +1100
Andrew Beekhof пишет:
>
> > On 1 Nov 2014, at 11:03 pm, Patrick Kane wrote:
> >
> > Hi all:
> >
> > In July, list member Ken Gaillot reported occasional nonsensical resource
> > agent errors using Pacemaker
> > (http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker
В Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:26:34 +0100
Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 08:46:00AM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > В Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:32:45 +1100
> > Andrew Beekhof пишет:
> >
> > >
> > > > On 1 Nov 2014, at 11:03
В Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:05:39 +0530
Arjun Pandey пишет:
> Hi
>
> I have a 2 node CentOS -6.5 based cluster. This being run in active
> standby mode.
> When i want to trigger switchover from blackwidow to elektra (using
> 1.pcs standby blackwidow and 2. pcs unstandby blackwidow) it doesn't
> work.
В Mon, 3 Nov 2014 07:07:41 +
Alex Samad - Yieldbroker пишет:
> {snip}
> > > What I am hearing is that its not available. Is it possible to hook to
> > > a custom script on that event, I can write my own restart
> > >
> >
> > Sure you can write your own external stonith script.
>
>
> Any po
В Fri, 07 Nov 2014 17:46:40 +0100
Daniel Dehennin пишет:
> Hello,
>
> As I finally manage to integrate my VM to corosync and my dlm/clvm/GFS2
> are running on it.
>
> Now I have one issue, when the bare metal host on which the VM is
> running die, the VM is lost and can not be fenced.
>
> Is t
ne thing I do not know how it will behave in case of multiple
VMs on the same host. I.e. will pacemaker try to fence host for every
VM or recognize that all VMs are dead after the first time agent is
invoked.
> Daniel Dehennin napisał:
> >Andrei Borzenkov writes:
> >
> >
&
В Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:19:56 +0100
Hauke Homburg пишет:
> Am 11.11.2014 13:34, schrieb Alexandre:
> >
> > You should use an opt out cluster. Set the cluster option
> > symmetrical=false. This will tell corosync not to place a resource
> > anywhere on the cluster, unless a location rule explicit
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Dmitry Matveichev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We have a cluster configured via pacemaker+corosync+crm. The configuration
> is:
>
>
>
> node master
>
> node slave
>
> primitive HA-VIP1 IPaddr2 \
>
> params ip=192.168.22.71 nic=bond0 \
>
> op monitor inte
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Dmitry Matveichev
wrote:
> We've already tried to set it but it didn't help.
>
I doubt it is possible to say anything without logs.
>
> Kind regards,
> Dmitriy Matveichev.
>
>
> -Original Mes
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 10:57 pm, Dmitry Matveichev
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a cluster configured via pacemaker+corosync+crm. The configuration
>> is:
>>
>> node master
>> node slave
>> primitive HA-VIP1 IPaddr2 \
>> par
В Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:53:10 +
"Brusq, Jerome" пишет:
> Dear all,
>
> We are running corosync-1.4.1-4.el6.x86_64 on RHEL 6.2. We have a cluster
> with 2 nodes that run as services a Virtual IP and around 20 custom LSB
> scripts.
> We had some network issue 2 weeks ago and we got a strange
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Brendan Reekie wrote:
> I’m running into an issues with the pgsql resource agent running on CentOS7.
> The issue is when the pgsql resource agent attempts a call to runasowner it
> uses a su as user postgres in a call to ocf_run, this is causing what
> appears to
В Thu, 27 Nov 2014 08:24:56 +0300
Vladislav Bogdanov пишет:
> 27.11.2014 03:43, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> >> On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:37 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Is there any information how watchdog integration is intended to work?
> >> What are currently-eval
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> We are using Pacemaker and Corosync with CMAN as our HA software as
> below version.
>
> OS:CentOS release 6.5 (Final) 64-bit
> Pacemaker:pacemaker.x86_641.1.10-14.el6_5.3
> Co
is no resource res.vBKN in your logs or configuration snippet
you have shown.
> But why? Since there is no configuration is changed.
>
> --teenigma
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:56 AM, Teerapatr Kittiratanachai
>>
LRM operation res.vBKN6_stop_0 (call=97, rc=1, cib-update=34,
confirmed=true) unknown error
This means pacemaker cannot start res.vBKN6 anywhere else, at least
without going via node stonith.
> --teenigma
>
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec
В Wed, 17 Dec 2014 16:38:56 +0100
"Thomas Manninger" пишет:
> Hi,
>
> i am using pacemaker on debian in a test environment. pacemaker version is:
> 1.1.7-1
>
> I have a problem unterstanding minus points in a location.
>
> I have 3 nodes in my test environment, node1, node2 and node3
> I c
В Mon, 22 Dec 2014 16:25:00 -0500 (EST)
David Vossel пишет:
>
> Linux has this non-portable concept of abstract sockets. This lets us create
> sockets without mapping directly to something on the filesystem. Unfortunately
> solaris doesn't have this feature. Somewhere along the line we introduce
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 06:11:49AM +0300, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have a geographically distributed cluster, all machines have public IP
>> addresses. No virtual IP subnet exists, so no multicast is available.
>>
>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> Hi Andrew, David, all.
>
> I found a little bit strange operation ordering during transition execution.
>
> Could you please look at the following partial configuration (crmsh syntax)?
>
> ===
> ...
> clone cl-broker broker \
>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Kostiantyn,
>
>
>> One more thing to clarify.
>> You said "rebind can be avoided" - what does it mean?
>
> By that I mean that as long as you don't shutdown interface everything
> will work as expected. Interface shutdown is administrator deci
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:06 PM, brook davis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a master-slave resource and I'd like to achieve the following
> behavior with it:
>
> * Only ever run (as master or slave) on 2 specific nodes (out of N possible
> nodes). These nodes are predetermined and are specified at re
В Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:58:57 +0100
Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 04:41:19PM +0100, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:15:44PM +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:18:50AM +0100, Digimer wrote:
> > > > That is the p
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am facing some issues while trying out fence_ipmilan on ILO4 setup when
> using encrypted passwords. Which mailing list can i contact for this ?
> Basically if i test out fence_ipmilan/fence_ilo4 from cmd line with
> plaintext passwo
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Kazunori INOUE
wrote:
> 2015-04-10 15:09 GMT+09:00 Andrei Borzenkov :
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Kazunori INOUE
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I defined multiple instance_attributes [*].
>>> *
>>
В Sun, 19 Apr 2015 14:23:27 +0200
Andreas Kurz пишет:
> On 2015-04-17 12:36, Thomas Manninger wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > i have a pacemaker/corosync2 setup with 4 nodes, stonith configured over
> > ipmi interface.
> >
> > My problem is, that sometimes, a wrong node is stonithed.
> > As examp
On 12.08.2015 17:18, Michael Böhm wrote:
2015-08-12 15:45 GMT+02:00 Karl Rößmann :
Hi,
is there an easy way to determine in a script (bash or python) whether
a CRM Resource (Xen Domain) is running or not ?
We query the location of a resource in bash with this:
if [ ! "$(/usr/sbin/crm_re
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Sven Moeller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have to build a 2 node NFS Cluster based on Pacemaker/Corosync. The Volume
> used for the filesystem that will be exported by NFS is on a shared storage.
> I would like to use cLVM on this Volume.
Why do you need cLVM in the first
60 matches
Mail list logo
