Re: [Pacemaker] Mostly STONITH Questions / Seeking Best Practice

2012-09-07 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2012-09-06T09:07:44, David Morton wrote: > What I'm looking for here is not a backup for the existing STONITH > mechanism but an additional level of (storage based) protection as we are > using non-clustered filesystems. From what i read in the documentation this > is the purpose of sfex ? To

Re: [Pacemaker] problem starting new instance of pacemaker (via corosync)

2012-09-07 Thread John White
An odd update to this. We run in a stateless environment (nodes are pxe booted and have NFS roots, etc). Trying the same install on a VM works just fine. I wonder if anyone has experience with pacemaker and stateless nodes. John White HPC Systems Engineer (510) 486-7307 One Cy

Re: [Pacemaker] problem starting new instance of pacemaker (via corosync)

2012-09-07 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
07.09.2012 18:28, John White wrote: > An odd update to this. We run in a stateless environment (nodes are > pxe booted and have NFS roots, etc). Trying the same install on a VM > works just fine. I wonder if anyone has experience with pacemaker and > stateless nodes. I run it with iso image loaded

Re: [Pacemaker] problem starting new instance of pacemaker (via corosync)

2012-09-07 Thread John White
I actually just chased my tail down this path to no avail (mounted /var/run from a local disk). I'll give the tmpfs a try. Here is my /proc/mounts: rootfs / rootfs rw,relatime 0 0 /proc /proc proc rw,relatime 0 0 /sys /sys sysfs rw,relatime 0 0 /proc/bus/usb /proc/bus/usb usbfs rw,relatime 0 0 n

Re: [Pacemaker] problem starting new instance of pacemaker (via corosync)

2012-09-07 Thread John White
Well wouldn't you know, stuffing everything in tmpfs did the trick. Thanks a whole lot for your help! John White HPC Systems Engineer (510) 486-7307 One Cyclotron Rd, MS: 50C-3209C Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Berkeley, CA 94720 On Sep 7, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov