On 02/07/2013, at 7:32 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>> Our problem is that if i give "crm resource stop vm1" and immediatly after
>>> "crm resource stop vm2"
>>> it happens that pacemaker begins to stop vm2 only after vm1 is stopped.
>> Ther
On 2013-07-02T10:46:09, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Our problem is that if i give "crm resource stop vm1" and immediatly after
> > "crm resource stop vm2"
> > it happens that pacemaker begins to stop vm2 only after vm1 is stopped.
> There's nothing in the config to suggest that this would happen.
Apparently CC'ing the list on my replies was too subtle... can you please sign
up to and reply to the mailing list?
I don't do private support.
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
wrote:
> Our problem is that if i give "crm resource stop vm1" and immediatly after
> "crm resource st
On 28/06/2013, at 10:48 PM, Sartoratti Lorenzo
wrote:
> Hi
> Il 06/28/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof ha scritto:
>> On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
>>> We have 30 virtual machines
On 28/06/2013, at 5:19 AM, Lorenzo Sartoratti
wrote:
> Hi,
> we are using pacemaker since two years and we are quite satisfied: thanks!
> We have 30 virtual machines running in the cluster and maintained by
> pacemaker.
> When we stop the machines with crm, they are not stopped in parallel but
