Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker colocation after one node is down

2013-05-16 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 2013-05-16 13:42, Wolfgang Routschka wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > thank you for your answer. > > solutions is one coloation with -score ah, yes only _one_ of them with a non-negative value is needed. Scores of all constraints are added up. Regards, Andreas > > colocation cl_g_ip-address_n

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker colocation after one node is down

2013-05-16 Thread Wolfgang Routschka
Hi Andreas, thank you for your answer. solutions is one coloation with -score colocation cl_g_ip-address_not_on_r_postfix -1: g_ip-address r_postfix Greetings Wolfgang On 2013-05-15 21:30, Wolfgang Routschka wrote: > Hi everybody, > > one question today about colocation rule on a 2-node clu

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker colocation after one node is down

2013-05-15 Thread Andreas Kurz
On 2013-05-15 21:30, Wolfgang Routschka wrote: > Hi everybody, > > one question today about colocation rule on a 2-node cluster on > scientific linux 6.4 and pacemaker/cman. > > 2-Node Cluster > > first node haproxy load balancer proxy service - second node with > postfix service. > > coloc