On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alan Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> Not only safe but essential, otherwise B would kill A for no reason.
>> Transitional memberships are just corosync's way of saying "i;m still
>> working, but this is what I have so fa
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Not only safe but essential, otherwise B would kill A for no reason.
> Transitional memberships are just corosync's way of saying "i;m still
> working, but this is what I have so far".
>
The best explanation I've found for the transitional
Please send emails just once thankyou.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Alan Jones wrote:
> It appears from the code in lib/ais/plugin.c:pcmk_peer_update() that
> Pacemaker ignores
> transitional membership updates from Corosync. It is my understanding that
> this information
> tells you which m
