On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:32:20AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> * Dejan Muhamedagic [20110224 05:31]:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:53:23AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > > * Dejan Muhamedagic [20110223 09:21]:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:22:38PM -05
* Dejan Muhamedagic [20110224 05:31]:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:53:23AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > * Dejan Muhamedagic [20110223 09:21]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On a cluster that is
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:53:23AM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> * Dejan Muhamedagic [20110223 09:21]:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On a cluster that is about to go live I see theses warning popping up
> > >
* Dejan Muhamedagic [20110223 09:21]:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On a cluster that is about to go live I see theses warning popping up
> > quite frequently:
> >
> > lrmd: [6487]: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function for SI
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:22:38PM -0500, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On a cluster that is about to go live I see theses warning popping up
> quite frequently:
>
> lrmd: [6487]: WARN: G_SIG_dispatch: Dispatch function for SIGCHLD was delayed
> 240 ms (> 100 ms) before
> +being ca