Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread David Mohr
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:41:02 +0200, David Mohr wrote: ... > I opened bug 2464[1] for this issue. > >> Thanks, >> >> Dejan > > Thank you for the quick reply! > > ~David > > [1]: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 I forgot to mention: the bug report has the hb_repo

Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread David Mohr
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:37:23 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:34:16PM +0200, David Mohr wrote: ... >> * 2 nodes, >> * drbd in a primary/secondary setup, >> * an IP address that's supposed to be up on the drbd master. ... >> First we tried to move the master_ip

Re: [Pacemaker] Unexpected master/slave behavior

2010-08-09 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi, On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:34:16PM +0200, David Mohr wrote: > > Hi everyone, > we are trying to understand how pacemaker deals with master/slave > resources. After reading the documentation we believe we understand how > location and colocation work. Yet in practice we don't get the results t