Re: [Pacemaker] Trouble with drbd/pacemaker: switch to secondary/secondary

2016-10-21 Thread Vlad
In your post I didn't see any cluster configuration related to bnx2x only regarding IP address. On 18/10/16 10:05, Anne Nicolas wrote: > 2016-10-18 9:56 GMT+02:00 Vlad : >> Is something wrong with the network interface? >> >> [34114.046443] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Down >> [34185.7

Re: [Pacemaker] Trouble with drbd/pacemaker: switch to secondary/secondary

2016-10-18 Thread Anne Nicolas
2016-10-18 9:56 GMT+02:00 Vlad : > Is something wrong with the network interface? > > [34114.046443] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Down > [34185.719207] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Up, 1 Mbps > full duplex, Flow control: ON - receive & transmit > [34232.241599] bnx2x 000

Re: [Pacemaker] Trouble with drbd/pacemaker: switch to secondary/secondary

2016-10-18 Thread Vlad
Is something wrong with the network interface? [34114.046443] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Down [34185.719207] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Up, 1 Mbps full duplex, Flow control: ON - receive & transmit [34232.241599] bnx2x :05:00.0 enp5s0f0: NIC Link is Down [34268.

Re: [Pacemaker] Trouble with drbd/pacemaker: switch to secondary/secondary

2016-10-17 Thread Anne Nicolas
Le 17/10/2016 à 11:42, Kristoffer Grönlund a écrit : > Anne Nicolas writes: > >> Oct 14 17:42:59 [3445] bzvairsvr attrd: warning: >> attrd_cib_callback: Update master-drbdserv=1 failed: Transport >> endpoint is not connected > > Hi Anne, > > Wild guess: One or more ports is bei