Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.

ock Von: Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:04 An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down. Thanks Andreas for your kind answer, I'll add this to my test battery. Also, my other question,

Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.

: Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:04 An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down. Thanks Andreas for your kind answer, I'll add this to my test battery. Also, my other question, is it a go

Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.

Thanks Andreas for your kind answer, I'll add this to my test battery. Also, my other question, is it a good idea to close the corosync port? Should corosync behave in a expected way? I am getting odd behaviors on this one, but not sure if where to put the blame. Thanks in advance. Jacobo García

Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.

Hi Jacobo, one very interesting thing is missing. Overload the node. Make a programm/script which generates many IO-operations, many flushes and meanwhile requesting more and more memory from the OS until swapping begins. Ohhh, yes, swapping and IO is nice… …then you can prove your moni