25.07.2014 02:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
...
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey
>>> wrote:
>>>
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
>>
On 24 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 24.07.2014 03:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 21.07.
24.07.2014 03:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 23 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, V
On 23 Jul 2014, at 2:46 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 21.07.
23.07.2014 05:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, A
Hi Andrew
Yes this change would be useful.
Regards
Arjun
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>>
21.07.
On 21 Jul 2014, at 3:45 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>
>>> 21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 20
21.07.2014 08:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>
>> 21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at
On 21 Jul 2014, at 2:50 pm, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Right. A
21.07.2014 06:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>>
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemake
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:45 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>>
>>> Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
>>> pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemak
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
>
>> Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
>> pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
>> when the wrapper exits.nohup solves the problem
On 15 Jul 2014, at 8:00 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
> pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
> when the wrapper exits.nohup solves the problem but then HUP cannot be
> used by pacemaker. Is this workaround
Right. Actually the issue i am facing is that i am starting the
pacemaker service remotely from a wrapper and thus pacemakerd dies
when the wrapper exits.nohup solves the problem but then HUP cannot be
used by pacemaker. Is this workaround ok ?
I was checking out the current pacemaker code.setsid
On 15 Jul 2014, at 7:13 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> AFAIK linux daemons don't terminate on SIGHUP.
Read the man page, POSIX specifies that the default action is 'term' ie.
'terminate'.
> They typically reload
> configuration on receiving this signal.Eg- rsyslogd. I thought it was
Hi Andrew
AFAIK linux daemons don't terminate on SIGHUP. They typically reload
configuration on receiving this signal.Eg- rsyslogd. I thought it was
safe to make this assumption here as well.
Regards
Arjun
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 6:19 pm, Ar
On 15 Jul 2014, at 6:19 pm, Arjun Pandey wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am running pacemaker version 1.1.10-14.el6 on CentOS 6. On setting
> up cluster if I send SIGHUP to either pacemaker or corosync services ,
> they die.
> Is this a bug ? What is the intension behind this behavior?
Standard default
17 matches
Mail list logo