Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:21 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> What was the actual vs. expected behavior? > > With the following (simple) configuration on a 2 node cluster: > > primitive vip1 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ >        params ip="172.16.10

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-18 Thread Brice Figureau
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 14:21 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Brice > Figureau wrote: > > On 17/08/09 14:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Brice > >> Figureau wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-18 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > On 17/08/09 14:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Brice >> Figureau wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: >>

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-18 Thread Brice Figureau
On 17/08/09 14:22, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, That allows the resource to k

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-17 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice >> Figureau wrote: >> >> > >> > I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, >> >> That allows the resource to keep running as long a

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Brice Figureau
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 14:00 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice > Figureau wrote: > > > > > I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, > > That allows the resource to keep running as long as at least one node > has a copy of the clone running. > Not s

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Brice Figureau wrote: > > I was wondering if colocating with a clone would work, That allows the resource to keep running as long as at least one node has a copy of the clone running. Not sure if that helps in your scenario > because as I see > it (certainly a wr

Re: [Pacemaker] Resource colocation with a clone

2009-08-13 Thread Brice Figureau
Hi Diego, On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 18:06 -0400, Diego Julian Remolina wrote: > > Now that's where the things get interesting, I want to relocate the IP > > > > address on another node _if_ nginx fails on the node on which the IP > > runs. > > Are you already addressing network connectivity with pin