On 2009-07-14T18:01:15, Florian Haas wrote:
> That is true, and I am not contesting that they need to validate. I was
> actually asking for, what shall we call it, instance attribute value
> normalization.
Yeah, I agree. Though RAs can simply "enforce" this by only accepting
'true/false' or 'yes
Lars,
On 07/14/2009 05:15 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>> Now considering the CIB already does, for example, IDREF validation, I
>> really wonder why it shouldn't be doing content validation as well.
>
> It could, of course.
>
> But the problem would remain - the CLI/GUI would need to do their
On 2009-07-03T08:55:21, Florian Haas wrote:
> do nothing to actually enforce parameter types in the CIB. Instead, that
> metadata is intended simply as a hint for the GUI or the CRM shell, and
> parameter type enforcement is left to them. In other words, if a
> parameter is declared as 'content t
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 08:55:21AM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> continuing a discussion I started, briefly, with Andrew and Dejan yesterday.
>
> As I hear from Andrew, when we define parameters in resource agents and
> describe them in the RA metadata information, then the
