Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Pavel Georgiev wrote: > When can we expect a fix for this? You can either grab the latest source, or wait for the next maintenance release later this month. I try to keep this up-to-date: http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Releases#Supported_Release_Series > > > O

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-05 Thread Pavel Georgiev
When can we expect a fix for this? On May 4, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: Never mind, ignore all that. I see the problem. What I dont understand is why no-one else has been seeing this. Anyway, it really is a logging issue that you can safely ignore. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:15 A

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-04 Thread Eliot Gable
: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors Never mind, ignore all that. I see the problem. What I dont understand is why no-one else has been seeing this. Anyway, it really is a logging issue that you can safely ignore. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Beekhof

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Never mind, ignore all that. I see the problem. What I dont understand is why no-one else has been seeing this. Anyway, it really is a logging issue that you can safely ignore. On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Pavel Georgiev wrote: >> I g

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Pavel Georgiev wrote: > I get an awful lot of ' Action * took *s to complete' error since switching > from 1.0.2 to 1.0.3: [snip] > I`m running the prebuild rpms for centos5 (5.2 in my case). What hardware? I was expecting an ntpd clock jump, or a return of -1

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-01 Thread Pavel Georgiev
Here is the full log from running heartbeat for ~ 5 minutes. messages.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data On May 1, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: I'm almost positive these are bogus messages. Can you include the full log entries (with the time stamps) for a couple of them (a

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker 1.0.3 errors

2009-05-01 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I'm almost positive these are bogus messages. Can you include the full log entries (with the time stamps) for a couple of them (as well as some logs before and after the errror)? On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Pavel Georgiev wrote: > I get an awful lot of ' Action * took *s to complete' error