Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-27 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
On Thursday 27 January 2011 09:37:25 Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I read about the utilization feature in beekhofs blog. Really nice. But > > why do not take the next step and make the utilization in resources > > dyna

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-27 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Hi, > > I read about the utilization feature in beekhofs blog. Really nice. But why do > not take the next step and make the utilization in resources dynamic since RAM > or CPU usage will change with time. Complete lack of time :-)

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 16:01:00 Michael Smith wrote: > Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > > Imagine the consequences for a cloud cluster consisting of 30 nodes > > hosting 100 virtual machines. All machines would be migrated to the > > least possible number of real machines during the night when th

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Michael Smith
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: Imagine the consequences for a cloud cluster consisting of 30 nodes hosting 100 virtual machines. All machines would be migrated to the least possible number of real machines during the night when there no work to do. In the next morning when work starts virtual ma

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Dan Frincu
Hi, On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Robert van Leeuwen wrote: > > > The only thing to do that remains would be a daemon that switches off > > > unused machines to save energy. But this could be done using STONITH > > > agents. > > > > > > Basically this would be an option to make cloud computin

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 13:41:19 Robert van Leeuwen wrote: > > > The only thing to do that remains would be a daemon that switches off > > > unused machines to save energy. But this could be done using STONITH > > > agents. > > > > > > Basically this would be an option to make cloud computing r

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Robert van Leeuwen
> > The only thing to do that remains would be a daemon that switches off > > unused machines to save energy. But this could be done using STONITH > > agents. > > > > Basically this would be an option to make cloud computing really green! > > > > Please mail me your comments about this idea. Than

Re: [Pacemaker] Making utilizations dynamic

2011-01-25 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
On Thursday 20 January 2011 23:02:25 Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Hi, > > I read about the utilization feature in beekhofs blog. Really nice. But why > do not take the next step and make the utilization in resources dynamic > since RAM or CPU usage will change with time. > > For a demonstration