On 2009-10-01T08:24:44, Mario Giammarco wrote:
A bit late, but I just noticed this.
If you have shared storage, check-out the external/sbd fencing agent.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 12:50 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Well, if we already have the option to use port-nodename mapping,
> that should be preferable to increasing the configuration size.
> Still, perhaps you could add a hostlist parameter like in most
> stonith plugins. Then just use that i
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 10:55:11AM +0200, Johan Verrept wrote:
>
> Hi Lars,
>
> > Yes.
> > hostname (-s, -f) and uname differ in that
> > uname -n just does one syscall (uname),
> > and hostname (typically) does a gethostname(),
> > then a gethostbyname(), the result of the latter
> > heavil
Hi Lars,
> Yes.
> hostname (-s, -f) and uname differ in that
> uname -n just does one syscall (uname),
> and hostname (typically) does a gethostname(),
> then a gethostbyname(), the result of the latter
> heavily influenced by whatever is in your nsswitch,
> resolv and other .conf, as well as wha
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
> > And whether or not these node names are fully-qualified or not is
> > actually not up to the user, but depends on the distro used. That was my
> > point. :)
>
> On the contrary, all my (Debian) pacemaker nodes have their FQDN as
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:39:19PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
> And whether or not these node names are fully-qualified or not is
> actually not up to the user, but depends on the distro used. That was my
> point. :)
On the contrary, all my (Debian) pacemaker nodes have their FQDN as the node
name
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 14:38 +0200, Johan Verrept wrote:
> Perhaps something in the nature of
>
> if [ `uname -n` = `hostname -s` ]
> then
> for host in `list_devices`;
> do
> echo $host
> done;
> else
> domainname=`hostname -d`
> for host in `list_devic
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 14:01 +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
> > gethosts)
> > # print hosts with domainname
> > domain=`domainname`
> > for host in `list_devices`;
> > do
> > echo $host.$domain
> > done;
>
> Can you make sure that this works both on systems where "uname
On 2009-10-05 14:28, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:01:49PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
>> On 2009-10-05 10:37, Johan Verrept wrote:
>>> Hello guys,
>>>
>>>I completed the RA and have attached it. As far as I can tell it is
>>> fully functional but I would appreci
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 02:01:49PM +0200, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2009-10-05 10:37, Johan Verrept wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> >I completed the RA and have attached it. As far as I can tell it is
> > fully functional but I would appreciate it if someone "in the know"
> > would take a loo
On 2009-10-05 10:37, Johan Verrept wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>I completed the RA and have attached it. As far as I can tell it is
> fully functional but I would appreciate it if someone "in the know"
> would take a look and gave me some feedback.
I'm unable to test this as I don't have a device
Hi Dejan,
We are glad to contribute. Pacemaker is an impressive project.
I used wget because I had prior experience. I am used to Gentoo systems,
so wget is always installed. Since the output isn't restricted to just
the information I want, I would have to sed the output anyway and the
lack of \n
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 10:37:54AM +0200, Johan Verrept wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
>I completed the RA and have attached it. As far as I can tell it is
> fully functional but I would appreciate it if someone "in the know"
> would take a look and gave me some feedback.
Many thanks for the con
Hello guys,
I completed the RA and have attached it. As far as I can tell it is
fully functional but I would appreciate it if someone "in the know"
would take a look and gave me some feedback.
Thank you,
Johan Verrept
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 11:04 +0200, Johan Verrept wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 05:22:57AM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:24:56 -0600 schrieb Remi Broemeling:
>
> > Hi Mario -- I was just looking into this myself, today. I think the
> > lowest cost that you'll be able to find is an IPMI card for your
> > motherboard (as lon
Hi,
in the meantime I got the device and am working on a RA. I will need
permission to post it here, so no promises. The telnet access can't
manage the ports but there is a documented cgi-based interface.
For now, I am pretty happy with the device.
J.
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 11:14 +0200,
Am Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:24:56 -0600 schrieb Remi Broemeling:
> Hi Mario -- I was just looking into this myself, today. I think the
> lowest cost that you'll be able to find is an IPMI card for your
> motherboard (as long as the motherboard in question supports it). To
> find out you'll need to lo
Mario Giammarco writes:
>
> Hello,
>
> Can you suggest me a list of stonith devices compatible with
> pacemaker?
>
> I need a low cost one.
>
Thank you for all replies. I have no ilo unfortunately.
Looking at this blog it seems that I can easily find stonith
devices for $20:
http://thecl
Hi guys,
When I looked into this yesterday , I found this device:
http://www.aviosys.com/ip_power_9258hp.html
At around 150 euro, it is pretty cheap. It is an independent device and
will not do nifty things like server console access (like the IPMI
cards) but it should work well for ston
I find the riloe plugin to be very good so if you can get cheap HP
servers with iLO then that could constitute a low cost STONITH device.
-Original Message-
From: Mario Giammarco [mailto:mgiamma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 September 2009 19:08
To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Subject: [Pacemaker]
Hi Mario -- I was just looking into this myself, today. I think the
lowest cost that you'll be able to find is an IPMI card for your
motherboard (as long as the motherboard in question supports it). To
find out you'll need to look into your specific model of motherboard
and see what is needed
21 matches
Mail list logo
