Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-20 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-02-20T10:43:57, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > Some fence agents can have 'reboot' implemented without OFF/ON procedure > > (direct usage of command 'reboot') for these multiple plug should be > > forbidden. > Could we not fall back to off off on on ? Some of those devices however also suppor

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-19 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Marek Grac wrote: > On 02/07/2013 07:07 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> This is right, fence agents (all of them) can be used only with one port >> value. >> Would this be a good feature to add? >> Particularly for people using "reboot" as the action. >> >> Otherwis

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-07 Thread Thibaut Pouzet
Le 07/02/2013 07:12, Andrew Beekhof a écrit : On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Thibaut Pouzet wrote: Le 05/02/2013 16:57, Marek Grac a écrit : Hi, On 02/05/2013 03:24 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: I cleared the IPMI configuration and kept only the two WTI fencing Primitives in my configuration to

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-07 Thread Marek Grac
On 02/07/2013 07:07 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: This is right, fence agents (all of them) can be used only with one port value. Would this be a good feature to add? Particularly for people using "reboot" as the action. Otherwise the caller (ie. me :-) ) has to split it up into stop 1, stop 2, star

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Thibaut Pouzet wrote: > Le 05/02/2013 16:57, Marek Grac a écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> On 02/05/2013 03:24 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> >>> I cleared the IPMI configuration and kept only the two WTI fencing >>> Primitives in my configuration to make it as simple as poss

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Marek Grac wrote: > Hi, > > > On 02/05/2013 03:24 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> I cleared the IPMI configuration and kept only the two WTI fencing >> Primitives in my configuration to make it as simple as possible : >> >> primitive wti_fence01 stonith:fence_wti \

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-05 Thread Thibaut Pouzet
Le 05/02/2013 16:57, Marek Grac a écrit : Hi, On 02/05/2013 03:24 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: I cleared the IPMI configuration and kept only the two WTI fencing Primitives in my configuration to make it as simple as possible : primitive wti_fence01 stonith:fence_wti \ params ipaddr="192

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-05 Thread Marek Grac
Hi, On 02/05/2013 03:24 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: I cleared the IPMI configuration and kept only the two WTI fencing Primitives in my configuration to make it as simple as possible : primitive wti_fence01 stonith:fence_wti \ params ipaddr="192.168.0.7" action="reboot" verbose="true" pc

Re: [Pacemaker] Fencing configuration with pcmk_host_map argument

2013-02-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Thibaut Pouzet wrote: > Hi, > > I am running some tests in order to implement fencing with two methods, and > I got stuck on the WTI configuration while the IPMI configuration was pretty > straight forward. > > I have an installation with two nodes on Centos 6.3 ru