Hi,
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/3312b9e
It seems that this changeset works fine to our problems,
Thank you!
Regards,
Junko
>> I'm not 100% sure I like this patch but could you see how it behaves
>> in your testing?
>
> Or if it helps:
> https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Junko IKEDA
>>> wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the confusion.
Pacemaker 1.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sorry for the confusion.
>>>
>>> Pacemaker 1.0.10 OK(group resource can failover)
>>> Pacemaker 1.0.11 NG(gruop re
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry for the confusion.
>>
>> Pacemaker 1.0.10 OK(group resource can failover)
>> Pacemaker 1.0.11 NG(gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
>> Pacemaker 1.1 <- the late
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the confusion.
>
> Pacemaker 1.0.10 OK(group resource can failover)
> Pacemaker 1.0.11 NG(gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
> Pacemaker 1.1 <- the latest hg (gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
We've actuall
Hi,
sorry for the confusion.
Pacemaker 1.0.10 OK(group resource can failover)
Pacemaker 1.0.11 NG(gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
Pacemaker 1.1 <- the latest hg (gruop resource just stop, can not failover)
By the way, your simulation showed dummy01 restart on bl460g1n13 again,
but du
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Which version did you check?
>
> Pacemaker 1.0.11.
I meant of 1.1 since you said:
"Pacemaker 1.1 shows the same behavior."
>
>> The latest from git seems to work fine:
>>
>> Current cluster status:
>> Online: [ bl460g1n13 bl460g1n
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pacemaker 1.1 shows the same behavior.
Which version did you check?
The latest from git seems to work fine:
Current cluster status:
Online: [ bl460g1n13 bl460g1n14 ]
Resource Group: grpDRBD
dummy01(ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): S
Hi,
Pacemaker 1.1 shows the same behavior.
It seems that the following chengeset has the problems.
http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/stable-1.0/diff/281c8c03a8c2/pengine/native.c
I could get the expected behavior with the latest Pacemaker 1.0 after
reverting the above change.
Thanks,
Junko
2