Hi,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:18:36PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> Johannes Freygner wrote:
>
> > *) Yes, and I found the wrong setting:
>
> Excellent.
>
> > But if I pull the power cable without a regular shutting down,
> > the powerless node gets status "UNCLEAN (offline)" and the
> > resou
Johannes Freygner wrote:
> *) Yes, and I found the wrong setting:
Excellent.
> But if I pull the power cable without a regular shutting down,
> the powerless node gets status "UNCLEAN (offline)" and the
> resources remains stopped.
I would contend that would be correct behavior as (again assu
Hi Devin,
see *)
-Original Message-
From: Devin Reade [mailto:g...@gno.org]
Sent: Dienstag, 04. Jänner 2011 19:34
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Best stonith method to avoid split brain on a drbd
cluster
--On Monday, January 03, 2011 09:14:29 PM
--On Monday, January 03, 2011 09:14:29 PM +0100 han...@freygner.at wrote:
> As I have tested, its not a problem on the shutdown order. On a regular
> shutdown everything is working fine until I pull the power cable.
So just before pulling the power cable, the running node reports
itself as online
Johannes Freygner wrote:
> You mean with corosync will work fine, because I am using heartbeat instead.
I suspect that it's a similar situation with heartbeat. The problem is
pacemaker losing communication before the node cleanly disconnects.
The behavior I saw on my own clusters is that becau
Johannes Freygner wrote:
> could somebody give me an idea what will be the best stonith solution on a
> drbd cluster to avoid split brain if the network between the nodes is lost.
>
> I have already tried to use stonith with ILO, but if the power cable is
> removed from the node (because we ha
