On 19 October 2010 14:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
> > On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resou
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
> On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
>>> never run due to location constraints?
On 10 October 2010 17:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
>> never run due to location constraints?
>
> Because part of its job is to make sure they dont run there.
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
> never run due to location constraints?
Because part of its job is to make sure they dont run there.
> I am getting this messages and I am wondering if they har
On 9 October 2010 23:20, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
> never run due to location constraints?
> I am getting this messages and I am wondering if they harmless or not.
>
> 23:12:38 pengine: [7705]: notice: unpack_rsc_op: Hard
Hi,
Does anyone know why PE wants to unpack resources on nodes that will
never run due to location constraints?
I am getting this messages and I am wondering if they harmless or not.
23:12:38 pengine: [7705]: notice: unpack_rsc_op: Hard error -
sshd-pbx_01_monitor_0 failed with rc=5: Preventing s
