Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 06:11:22AM +, Bauer, Stefan (IZLBW Extern) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem to mount a cifs share. Additionally I
> enabled OCF_CHECK_LEVEL 20 to read/write from the cifs-share during monitor
> operation:
>
> If I block the connection to th
Hello,
I'm using ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem to mount a cifs share. Additionally I
enabled OCF_CHECK_LEVEL 20 to read/write from the cifs-share during monitor
operation:
If I block the connection to the cifs-server with iptables, the monitor
operation times out. After several tries, a restart of
On 13/06/2013, at 6:10 PM, andreas graeper wrote:
> hi,
> i use ocf:heartbeat to nfs-export the mounted /dev/drbd0 on drbd:master node.
> n1:master n2:slave
> n1 -> standby
> n2 takes over (well done)
> n1 reboot
> n1 online
> n2 standby
> now exportfs still started on n2 (unmanaged) FAILED
hi,
i use ocf:heartbeat to nfs-export the mounted /dev/drbd0 on drbd:master
node.
n1:master n2:slave
n1 -> standby
n2 takes over (well done)
n1 reboot
n1 online
n2 standby
now exportfs still started on n2 (unmanaged) FAILED
what does started+unmanaged+failed mean in detail
and how can i
+ get tha
On 30/05/2013, at 6:50 PM, "Alexandr A. Alexandrov" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> So what is the correct scenario then?
> Editing CIB and removing 'monitor' operation altogether with making resource
> unmanaged?
As I wrote in my first reply:
>> A better approach would have been to disable the recurring m
Hi!
So what is the correct scenario then?
Editing CIB and removing 'monitor' operation altogether with
making resource unmanaged?
Best regards,
Alexandr
30.05.2013 04:54, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
Yes, i made j
On 24/05/2013, at 5:32 PM, Alexandr A. Alexandrov wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
>> Did you set is-managed=false for the group or a resource in the group?
>> I'm assuming the latter - basically the cluster noticed your resource was
>> not running anymore.
>> While it did not try and do anything to f
Andrew,
How should this be done?
Just removing 'op monitor interval="15" timeout="20"' from the
resource primitive?
24.05.2013 07:29, Andrew Beekhof пишет:
A better approach would have been to disable the recurring monitor - then the
Hi Andrew,
Did you set is-managed=false for the group or a resource in the group?
I'm assuming the latter - basically the cluster noticed your resource was not running anymore.
While it did not try and do anything to fix that resource, it did stop anything that neede
On 23/05/2013, at 8:52 PM, Alexandr A. Alexandrov wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> On one of my clusters I have resources groups, second group depends on first
> resource in the first group. Today I needed to restart one service from the
> first group (no dependancies other than group), so I made in unm
Hi, All!
On one of my clusters I have resources groups, second group depends
on first resource in the first group. Today I needed to restart one
service from the first group (no dependancies other than group), so
I made in unmanaged:
May 23 14:14:22 kennedy
11 matches
Mail list logo
