Re: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on resources

2012-05-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:30 AM, David Vossel wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Parshvi" >> To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org >> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:22:01 AM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on

Re: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on resources

2012-04-19 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Parshvi" > To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:22:01 AM > Subject: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on > resources > > Observations: > max-children=30 > t

Re: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on resources

2012-04-19 Thread Parshvi
Dan Frincu writes: > > Hi, > > >  c. SOLUTION: the max-children of lrmd was raised to 30. > >  d. ISSUES STILL OBSERVED: while 2-3 resources are stuck in start operation, > > if a rsc is issued an explicit start command `crm resource start rcs1`, > > then the > > start op on this rsc is delay

Re: [Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on resources

2012-04-19 Thread Dan Frincu
Hi, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Parshvi wrote: > Observations: > max-children=30 > total no. of resources=18 > > 1) At a default value 4 of max-children, following logs were observed > that led to monitor op’s timeout for some resources (a total of 18 rscs): >  a. “max_child_count (4) reache

[Pacemaker] start/stop operations fail to happen in parallel on resources

2012-04-19 Thread Parshvi
Observations: max-children=30 total no. of resources=18 1) At a default value 4 of max-children, following logs were observed that led to monitor op’s timeout for some resources (a total of 18 rscs): a. “max_child_count (4) reached, postponing execution of operation monitor” b. “WARN: perform