On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 02:28:35PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> You're wanting to run multiple instances of pacemaker on a single node?
> That's unlikely to work.
>
> Why not use a vm instead?
linux containers would probably be the most lightweight virtualization
for that purpose, and works gre
You're wanting to run multiple instances of pacemaker on a single node?
That's unlikely to work.
Why not use a vm instead?
On 10/29/10, Alan Jones wrote:
> Has anyone configured pacemaker to simulate multiple nodes with multiple
> process instances?
> Ideally, I'd like to bind corosync daemons t
Has anyone configured pacemaker to simulate multiple nodes with multiple
process instances?
Ideally, I'd like to bind corosync daemons to different loopback IPs (e.g.
127.0.0.1, 127.0.0.2, etc) and somehow direct the pacemaker instances to
separate corosync processes.
Any thoughts or comments welco
