On 11 Jun 2014, at 10:59 pm, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> From: Andrew Beekhof
> Sent: 2014-06-11 02:36:15 EDT
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
>
>> On 11 Jun 2014, at 3:44 pm, Patrick Hemmer
>> wrote:
&
*From: *Andrew Beekhof
*Sent: * 2014-06-11 02:36:15 EDT
*To: *The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
*Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
> On 11 Jun 2014, at 3:44 pm, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
>>> Right. But each node still has 4998000+ units with which
On 11 Jun 2014, at 3:44 pm, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>>>
>> Right. But each node still has 4998000+ units with which to accommodate
>> something that only requires 1.
>> Thats about 0.2% of the remaining capacity, so wherever it starts, its
>> hardly making a dint.
>>
> You're thinking of t
*From: *Andrew Beekhof
*Sent: * 2014-06-10 02:25:09 EDT
*To: *The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
*Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
> On 5 Jun 2014, at 10:38 am, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Beekhof
>> Sent: 2014-06-04 20:15:22 EDT
>> T
On 5 Jun 2014, at 10:38 am, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> From: Andrew Beekhof
> Sent: 2014-06-04 20:15:22 EDT
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
>
>> On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:57 am, Patrick Hemmer
>> wrot
*From: *Andrew Beekhof
*Sent: * 2014-06-04 20:15:22 EDT
*To: *The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
*Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
> On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:57 am, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
>> From: Andrew Beekhof
>> Sent: 2014-06-04 04:15:48 E
>> T
On 5 Jun 2014, at 12:57 am, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> From: Andrew Beekhof
> Sent: 2014-06-04 04:15:48 E
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
>
>> On 4 Jun 2014, at 4:22 pm, Patrick Hemmer
>> wrot
*From: *Andrew Beekhof
*Sent: * 2014-06-04 04:15:48 E
*To: *The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
*Subject: *Re: [Pacemaker] resources not rebalancing
> On 4 Jun 2014, at 4:22 pm, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>
>> Testing some different scenarios, and after bringing a node back online,
On 4 Jun 2014, at 4:22 pm, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> Testing some different scenarios, and after bringing a node back online, none
> of the resources move to it unless they are restarted. However
> default-resource-stickiness is set to 0, so they should be able to move
> around freely.
>
> # p
Testing some different scenarios, and after bringing a node back online,
none of the resources move to it unless they are restarted. However
default-resource-stickiness is set to 0, so they should be able to move
around freely.
# pcs status
Cluster name: docker
Last updated: Wed Jun 4 06:09:26 20
10 matches
Mail list logo