Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-03-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Testuser SST wrote: > Failed actions: >    Apache_start_0 (node=astinos, call=19, rc=1, status=complete): unknown > error > > Any suggestions ? The apache is normal operabel with a service httpd > stop/start command. > Well, thats not the same script that the

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-16 Thread Testuser SST
normal operabel with a service httpd stop/start command. Kind Regards Sven Original-Nachricht > Datum: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:44:47 +0100 > Von: Andrew Beekhof > An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up &

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
egards > > Sven > > > Original-Nachricht >> Datum: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:22:49 +0200 >> Von: Vladislav Bogdanov >> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up > >> 08.02.2011 17:13, Testuser SST wro

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-09 Thread Testuser SST
Hi Vladislav, no, selinux is disabled right now. Kind Regards Sven Original-Nachricht > Datum: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:22:49 +0200 > Von: Vladislav Bogdanov > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up > 0

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-09 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
08.02.2011 17:13, Testuser SST wrote: > Hi, > > I´m implementing a two node webserver on CentOS 5 with > heartbeat/pacemaker and DRBD. The first new installed node works > fine, but when the second node becomes active, there seems to be a > problem with the apache starting up. Is there a way to ge

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-09 Thread Testuser SST
r cluster resource manager > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up > Hi Sven > not to sure if this will help or not but i had a similar issue with > heartbeat/pacemaker on centos and i added these entries into my httpd.conf > and it works fine now > > *1- S

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-09 Thread Testuser SST
quot;false" \ no-quorum-policy="ignore" rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \ resource-stickiness="100" 2. nothing, httpd starts without any info 3. httpd-2.2.3-43.el5.centos.3 4. yes, both httpd.conf seems to be identical. Kind Regards Sven ---

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-08 Thread paul harford
Hi Sven not to sure if this will help or not but i had a similar issue with heartbeat/pacemaker on centos and i added these entries into my httpd.conf and it works fine now *1- Setting* ExtendedStatus On *2- Enable the server-status* SetHandler server-status Order deny,allow De

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 08.02.2011 17:05, Testuser SST wrote: Hi Raoul, there is no entry in any httpd-logfile at the specific time. And the httpd.conf exists in the right path. [root@astinos httpd]# locate httpd.conf /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf 1. please post your config 2. what happens when you start httpd via

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-08 Thread Testuser SST
t; Von: "Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]" > An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up > On 02/08/2011 04:13 PM, Testuser SST wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I´m implementing a two node webserver on CentOS 5 with > heartbe

Re: [Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-08 Thread Raoul Bhatia [IPAX]
On 02/08/2011 04:13 PM, Testuser SST wrote: > Hi, > > I´m implementing a two node webserver on CentOS 5 with heartbeat/pacemaker > and DRBD. The first new installed node works fine, but when the second node > becomes active, there seems to be a problem with the apache starting up. Is > there a

[Pacemaker] problem with apache coming up

2011-02-08 Thread Testuser SST
Hi, I´m implementing a two node webserver on CentOS 5 with heartbeat/pacemaker and DRBD. The first new installed node works fine, but when the second node becomes active, there seems to be a problem with the apache starting up. Is there a way to get some more information about the problem. I ca