Re: [Pacemaker] pingd location constraints

2010-12-14 Thread Simon Jansen
Hi, I just want to let you know that the problem is solved. Thanks to "crm_mon -f". ;) The error was the usage of the pingd RA. This RA worked very unreliable and is marked as deprecated though ( http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.highavailability.user/32290). So after changing the RA to ocf:pa

Re: [Pacemaker] pingd location constraints

2010-12-14 Thread Simon Jansen
Hi Mike, thank you for the advice. Referring to my actual knowledge the resource stickiness just defines that a resource should remain to the node it is running on. The failover and failback actions are performed correctly with the location contraints that bind the resources to a specific node wh

Re: [Pacemaker] pingd location constraints

2010-12-13 Thread Mike Diehn
Simon, I'm new to this, so if this doesn't help, don't despair - the more experienced members will be along shortly. :-) Could it be that you need "stickyness?" I think that's the term for the concept you are describing. Also, if that's a two node cluster, have you defined cluster property no-q

Re: [Pacemaker] pingd location constraints

2010-12-13 Thread Simon Jansen
With the help of "crm_mon -f" I found out that just one node has the right pingd score. Migration summary: * Node node1: pingd=3 * Node node2: pingd=0 When I intiate a failover by setting node1 to standby the pingd score on node2 becomes 3. A ping that is run manually arrives the destina

[Pacemaker] pingd location constraints

2010-12-13 Thread Simon Jansen
Hi, I'm trying to set up location contraints for my cluster, but I don't get them to work in the way that I want. The constraints should implement the following behaviour: - Normal operation msDRBD0 and resIP0 start on node1, msDRBD1 and resIP1 start on node2 - Loss of network connection When the