No objections at all-- that would be great!
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:46:40 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> Dan - any objections if I incorporate the fping parts into the ping
> RA?https://www.ucar.edu/csac/vpn/
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Dan Urist wrote:
> > Here's my fping RA, for anyon
Dan - any objections if I incorporate the fping parts into the ping RA?
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Dan Urist wrote:
> Here's my fping RA, for anyone who's interested. Note that some of the
> parameters are different than ping/pingd, since fping works
> differently.
>
> The major advantages
Here's my fping RA, for anyone who's interested. Note that some of the
parameters are different than ping/pingd, since fping works
differently.
The major advantages of fping over the system ping are that multiple
hosts can be pinged with a single fping command, and fping will return
as soon as al
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:41:25 +0800
Yingliang Yang wrote:
> 2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
> > I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
> > pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA
> > to return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of
> >
2011/7/22 Dan Urist wrote:
> I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
> pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA to
> return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of linux's
> system ping as used in the standard ping RA is to run COUNT
I am in the process of trying to write an fping RA, based on the
pacemaker ping RA. My impetus for this is that I would like the RA to
return success as soon as any ping succeeds; the behavior of linux's
system ping as used in the standard ping RA is to run COUNT pings
within the given deadline and
