Re: [Pacemaker] pcs command does not work as expected.

Hi Chris and Gene. Thanks for your response. > >Which version of the pcs rpm are you using? (rpm -q pcs) I had previously used pcs-0.9.44-5.fc20.x86_64.rpm , but that version was not implemented "expression rule". so I downloaded pcs-0.9.115 at https://github.com/feist/pcs/releases, I built it

Re: [Pacemaker] pcs command does not work as expected.

Hi, thanks for the response. Please see inline replies. Note, this is part of an automated test. It normal works, but will usually file 1 in 20 tries for me. The point is that it¹s intermittent. Gene On 4/8/14, 3:38 PM, "Chris Feist" wrote: >On 03/24/2014 08:55 PM, Naoya Anzai wrote: >> Hi

Re: [Pacemaker] pcs command does not work as expected.

On 03/24/2014 08:55 PM, Naoya Anzai wrote: Hi all, I'm using pcs 0.9.115 on fedora 20. Which version of the pcs rpm are you using? (rpm -q pcs) This issues has been recently been fixed, but there may not yet be a fedora build. Thanks, Chris --- [root@saturn ~]# pcs --version 0.9.115 [ro

[Pacemaker] pcs command does not work as expected.

Hi all, I'm using pcs 0.9.115 on fedora 20. --- [root@saturn ~]# pcs --version 0.9.115 [root@saturn ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) --- I want to add locational rule property "boolean-op" using pcs, but this pcs seems it does not be implemented... --- [root@saturn ~]#