Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Ok, the main conclusion I can make is that pacemaker does not have any > memory leaks in code paths used by a static cluster. Huzah! :) ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
12.12.2012 05:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 11.12.2012 06:52, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> 11.12.2012 05:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 11.12.2012 06:52, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 11.12.2012 05:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew B

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 11.12.2012 05:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM,

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-10 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
11.12.2012 06:52, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 11.12.2012 05:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogda

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-10 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
11.12.2012 05:12, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew B

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-10 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I wonder what the growth looks l

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-10 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
10.12.2012 09:56, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I wonder what the growth looks like with the rec

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-09 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
10.12.2012 04:29, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: I wonder what the growth looks like with the recent libqb fix. That could be an explanation. >

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-09 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> I wonder what the growth looks like with the recent libqb fix. >>> That could be an explanation. >> >> Valid point. I will watch. > > On a almost s

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.12.2012 09:04, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I wonder what the growth looks like with the recent libqb fix. >> That could be an explanation. > > Valid point. I will watch. On a almost static cluster the only change in memory state during 24 hours is +70

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-05 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.12.2012 06:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I wonder what the growth looks like with the recent libqb fix. > That could be an explanation. Valid point. I will watch. > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 14.09.2012 09:54, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> 13.09.2012 15:1

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-12-05 Thread Andrew Beekhof
I wonder what the growth looks like with the recent libqb fix. That could be an explanation. On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 14.09.2012 09:54, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 13.09.2012 15:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> and now it runs on my testing clust

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-14 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
14.09.2012 09:54, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 13.09.2012 15:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > > ... > >> and now it runs on my testing cluster. >> >> Ipc-related memory problems seem to be completely fixed now, processes >> own memory (RES-SHR in terms of htop) does not grow any longer (after 40 >>

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-13 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
13.09.2012 15:18, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: ... > and now it runs on my testing cluster. > > Ipc-related memory problems seem to be completely fixed now, processes > own memory (RES-SHR in terms of htop) does not grow any longer (after 40 > minutes). Although I see that both RES and SHR counters

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-13 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
13.09.2012 06:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 12.09.2012 10:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 07.09.2012 09:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 12.09.2012 10:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 07.09.2012 09:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: ... > lrmd seems not to

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-12 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
12.09.2012 10:35, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 07.09.2012 09:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> ... lrmd seems not to clean up gio channels properly: >>> >>> I prefer to call g_io_channel

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 07.09.2012 09:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> ... >>> lrmd seems not to clean up gio channels properly: >> >> I prefer to call g_io_channel_unref() right after g_io_add_watch_full() >> inst

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-11 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
07.09.2012 09:25, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > ... >> lrmd seems not to clean up gio channels properly: > > I prefer to call g_io_channel_unref() right after g_io_add_watch_full() > instead of doing so when deleting descriptor (g_source_remove() is > en

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: ... > lrmd seems not to clean up gio channels properly: I prefer to call g_io_channel_unref() right after g_io_add_watch_full() instead of doing so when deleting descriptor (g_source_remove() is enough there). So channel will be automatically freed after

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
07.09.2012 03:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote: ... >>> cib shows tons of reachable memory in finished child processes. Not >>> important but log is huge, so it is very hard to find real errors. >> >> I found two minor (very slow) leaks in cib too: >> >> ==1732== 80 bytes in 20 blocks are still reachable

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 06/09/2012, at 10:43 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> 06.09.2012 12:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 06.09.2012 10:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vl

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread David Vossel
- Original Message - > From: "Vladislav Bogdanov" > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 4:58:45 AM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth > > 06.09.2012 12:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Thu,

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.09.2012 12:58, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.09.2012 12:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 06.09.2012 10:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed t

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.09.2012 12:39, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 06.09.2012 10:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: Hi, I noticed that some pacemaker processes grow during operation (co

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 06.09.2012 10:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I noticed that some pacemaker processes grow during operation (commit >>> 8535316). Running on top of corosync 2.0.1

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
06.09.2012 10:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that some pacemaker processes grow during operation (commit >> 8535316). Running on top of corosync 2.0.1. >> I notched RSS size (RES as htop reports) with interval of ~18

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that some pacemaker processes grow during operation (commit > 8535316). Running on top of corosync 2.0.1. > I notched RSS size (RES as htop reports) with interval of ~18 hours. > First column is notched after ~1 hour of

[Pacemaker] pacemaker processes RSS growth

2012-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi, I noticed that some pacemaker processes grow during operation (commit 8535316). Running on top of corosync 2.0.1. I notched RSS size (RES as htop reports) with interval of ~18 hours. First column is notched after ~1 hour of operation. Results are: pengine 23568 23780 crmd 1