Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-16 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Great! Thanks for the info+links!! On 5/16/2012 12:20 AM, Tim Serong wrote: > On 05/16/2012 12:42 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote: >> I'm sorry, no. It's on Ubuntu 11.10... I was looking into grabbing a >> copy of the SUSE community dvd iso the other night - would this come >> with all the necessary

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-15 Thread Tim Serong
On 05/16/2012 12:42 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > I'm sorry, no. It's on Ubuntu 11.10... I was looking into grabbing a > copy of the SUSE community dvd iso the other night - would this come > with all the necessary packages for setting up Pacemaker/Corosync + > OCFS2? If nothing else I'd be happ

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-15 Thread Matthew O'Connor
I'm sorry, no. It's on Ubuntu 11.10... I was looking into grabbing a copy of the SUSE community dvd iso the other night - would this come with all the necessary packages for setting up Pacemaker/Corosync + OCFS2? If nothing else I'd be happy to see if I could replicate the issue consistently, an

Re: [Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Is this on SLES by any chance? SUSE are about the only ones with knowledge in this area I'm afraid. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > Hi! > > I ran into the issue of ocfs2_controld.pcmk consuming vast CPU again - > twice, actually.  The most recent happenstance was after

[Pacemaker] ocfs2_controld.pcmk process issue

2012-05-14 Thread Matthew O'Connor
Hi! I ran into the issue of ocfs2_controld.pcmk consuming vast CPU again - twice, actually. The most recent happenstance was after a multi-node failure. One node stayed alive, two nodes had to be rebooted. After the reboots, one of the two came back without issue, and was able to mount the OCFS