Am 12.08.2010 04:12, schrieb Cnut Jansen:
> Basically I have a cluster of 2 nodes with cloned DLM-, O2CB-, DRBD-,
> mount-resources, and a MySQL-resource (grouped with an IPaddr-resource)
> running on top of the other ones.
> The MySQL(-group)-resource depends on the mount-resource, which depends
Am 17.08.2010 13:51, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:14:17AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
And if so: Is there also any possibility to define one-sided
dependencies/influences?
Take a look at mandatory vs. advisory constraints in the
Configuration Explained doc. A group is eq
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 04:14:17AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
> Am 16.08.2010 13:29, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> >On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:58AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
> >>Am 12.08.2010 18:46, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> >>>The migration-threshold shouldn't in any way influence resources
>
Am 16.08.2010 13:29, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:58AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
Am 12.08.2010 18:46, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
The migration-threshold shouldn't in any way influence resources
which don't depend on the resource which fails over. Couldn't
reproduce
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:58AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and first of all thanks for answering so far.
>
>
> Am 12.08.2010 18:46, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> >
> >The migration-threshold shouldn't in any way influence resources
> >which don't depend on the resource which fai
Hi,
and first of all thanks for answering so far.
Am 12.08.2010 18:46, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
The migration-threshold shouldn't in any way influence resources
which don't depend on the resource which fails over. Couldn't
reproduce it here with our example RAs.
Well, I now - just to clear
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:12:02AM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm once again experiencing (imho) strange behaviour respectively
> decision-making by Pacemaker, and I hope that someone can either
> enlighten me a little about this, its intention and/or a possible
> misconfiguration o
Hi,
I'm once again experiencing (imho) strange behaviour respectively
decision-making by Pacemaker, and I hope that someone can either
enlighten me a little about this, its intention and/or a possible
misconfiguration or something, or confirm it a possible bug.
Basically I have a cluster of
