Re: [Pacemaker] location constraint question

2010-09-21 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 21 September 2010 09:04, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis > wrote: >> On 21 September 2010 08:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote: BTW, why does crm_mon report only 4 resource? >>> >>> Because the drbd resources were made into master/slaves. >>> >>> See: >>>

Re: [Pacemaker] location constraint question

2010-09-21 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > On 21 September 2010 08:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> BTW, why does crm_mon report only 4 resource? >> >> Because the drbd resources were made into master/slaves. >> >> See: >>   ms ms-drbd_01 drbd_01 \ >>        meta master-max="1" master

Re: [Pacemaker] location constraint question

2010-09-21 Thread Pavlos Parissis
On 21 September 2010 08:38, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> BTW, why does crm_mon report only 4 resource? > > Because the drbd resources were made into master/slaves. > > See: >   ms ms-drbd_01 drbd_01 \ >        meta master-max="1" master-node-max="1" clone-max="2" > clone-node-max="1" notify="true" > O

Re: [Pacemaker] location constraint question

2010-09-20 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Pavlos Parissis wrote: > Hi, > I am having problems to understand why my DRBD ms resource wants a > location constraint. My setup is quite simple > 3 nodes > 2 resource groups which hold ip,fs and the dymmy resources > 2 resources for 2 drbd > 2 master/slave resour

[Pacemaker] location constraint question

2010-09-20 Thread Pavlos Parissis
Hi, I am having problems to understand why my DRBD ms resource wants a location constraint. My setup is quite simple 3 nodes 2 resource groups which hold ip,fs and the dymmy resources 2 resources for 2 drbd 2 master/slave resource for 2 DRBD. The objective is to have pbx_service_01 to use as prima