2009/2/20 Glory Smith :
> Thanks Lar for reply,
>>
>> The SBD mechanism provides a way to fence errant nodes. The cluster
>> manager itself ensures that it does not activate the resource several
>> times.
>
> my concern is suppose SBD resource is running on say node1 even then node2
> who is member
Thanks Lar for reply,
> The SBD mechanism provides a way to fence errant nodes. The cluster
> manager itself ensures that it does not activate the resource several
> times.
my concern is suppose SBD resource is running on say node1 even then node2
who is member of cluster will be able to access
On 2009-02-19T10:09:55, Glory Smith wrote:
> yes i understand this. i want something like , a node should be able to
> reserve a share disk to do any IO . while this node is holding the
> reservation other nodes should not be able to write any thing to that shared
> disk. if a node who has the
> The SBD mechanism ensures fencing through the shared disk. It can be
> used in combination with N nodes and OCFS2, for example.
yes i understand this. i want something like , a node should be able to
reserve a share disk to do any IO . while this node is holding the
reservation other nodes sho
On 2009-02-18T17:11:32, Glory Smith wrote:
> 1) well i guess SBD is bit different thing , it cannot be used for general
> data sharing purpose. i cant store my data on SBD disk and all members of
> cluster can access SBD at same time Please correct me if i am wrong. i am
> new to openais-pacemake
Thanks Lars for reply
>
>
> It is not supported via fencing.
>
> You have the choice of using a "poison pill" approach, as described on
> http://www.linux-ha.org/SBD_Fencing - or using the scsi2reservation or
> sfex resource agents to ensure exclusive access (but in that case, you
> have to set s
On 2009-02-17T17:26:10, Glory Smith wrote:
> Please help .
It is considered polite to NOT spam a mailing list with 3 hourly
reminders - people are in different timezones. And also the subject of
your mail is correct, a more relevant one would be appreciated ;-)
> > I am really very confused. I
Please help .
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Glory Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am really very confused. I had few discussions on Persistent reservation
> but didnot get any clear answer.
>
> i just need one answer. does Suse 11 openais-pacemaker cluster support
> Persistent Reservation fencing
Hi All,
I am really very confused. I had few discussions on Persistent reservation
but didnot get any clear answer.
i just need one answer. does Suse 11 openais-pacemaker cluster support
Persistent Reservation fencing as RHCS does.
if yes then which stonith should be used for this.
Regards,
_
