Re: [Pacemaker] failback off

2009-12-16 Thread E-Blokos
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 2:38 AM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] failback off On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, E-Blokos wrote: - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" To: Cc: Sent: Sunday, O

Re: [Pacemaker] failback off

2009-10-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:05 PM, E-Blokos wrote: > > - Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" > To: > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 4:04 PM > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] failback off > > >> Should be.  Did you try it? >> >

Re: [Pacemaker] failback off

2009-10-14 Thread E-Blokos
- Original Message - From: "Andrew Beekhof" To: Cc: Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 4:04 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] failback off Should be. Did you try it? On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, E-Blokos wrote: Hi, Is it possible to have a resource-stickiness in clone or

Re: [Pacemaker] failback off

2009-10-11 Thread Andrew Beekhof
Should be. Did you try it? On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:36 PM, E-Blokos wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to have a resource-stickiness in clone or group > meta-attribute ? > I'd like to keep the state of resource location even after a failback > > Thanks > > Franck Chionna > > ___

[Pacemaker] failback off

2009-10-07 Thread E-Blokos
Hi, Is it possible to have a resource-stickiness in clone or group meta-attribute ? I'd like to keep the state of resource location even after a failback Thanks Franck Chionna ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.c