18.01.2011 19:41, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...]
>>> No, it shouldn't be so, but I'm not sure. The earlier commit
>>> procedure has been quite complex (unnecessarily), and it's still
>>> sometimes in use in pacemaker 1.0.x. Is that the version you're
>>> running?
>>
>> No, 1.1.4.
>> Updating to lat
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 06:39:52PM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 18.01.2011 18:22, Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
> >>
18.01.2011 18:22, Dejan Muhamedagic пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
>> during 'crm configure load update', rather then edit-all/commit.
>>
>> I just observ
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 03:35:15PM +0200, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
> during 'crm configure load update', rather then edit-all/commit.
>
> I just observed this while pushing dozen of new primitives togethe
Hi all,
It looks like configuration lines are pushed to running CIB line-by-line
during 'crm configure load update', rather then edit-all/commit.
I just observed this while pushing dozen of new primitives together with
colocation/order constraints - primitives tried to start (and failed) on
a nod
