Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-02-28 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Kiss Bence wrote: > Hi Andrew, > >  did You have the time to look at the bug report? Are there anything missing > from it? Just looking now. My queue gets pretty long sometimes. > An other question. Maybe it better helps for me to understand the problem. > > If a

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-02-27 Thread Kiss Bence
Hi Andrew, did You have the time to look at the bug report? Are there anything missing from it? An other question. Maybe it better helps for me to understand the problem. If a node fails, what is the expected behaviour of the pacemaker to recover the node with stonith enabled and without i

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-02-12 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Kiss Bence wrote: > Hi, > > > On 01/30/2012 04:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kiss Bence  wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node >>> active/passive cluster based upon the doc

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-02-10 Thread Kiss Bence
Hi, On 01/30/2012 04:00 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kiss Bence wrote: Hi, I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node active/passive cluster based upon the documentation: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf My systems a

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-01-29 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Kiss Bence wrote: > Hi, > > I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node > active/passive cluster based upon the documentation: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > My systems are Fedora 14, uptodate. After forming the

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-01-26 Thread Kiss Bence
Hi, On 01/26/2012 02:13 PM, Dan Frincu wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kiss Bence wrote: Hi, I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node active/passive cluster based upon the documentation: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf My systems

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-01-26 Thread Dan Frincu
Hi, On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Kiss Bence wrote: > Hi, > > I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node > active/passive cluster based upon the documentation: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > > My systems are Fedora 14, uptodate. After forming

[Pacemaker] corosync vs. pacemaker 1.1

2012-01-25 Thread Kiss Bence
Hi, I am newbie to the clustering and I am trying to build a two node active/passive cluster based upon the documentation: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf My systems are Fedora 14, uptodate. After forming the cluster as wrote, I started to test it. (resources: drbd->