On 06/20/2011 07:35 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I don't think this is legal:
>
> service {
>
> name: corosync_quorum
>
> ver: 0
>
> name: pacemaker
>
> use_mgmtd: yes
>
> use_logd: yes
>
> }
>
>
> and even if it were, corosync
I don't think this is legal:
service {
name: corosync_quorum
ver: 0
name: pacemaker
use_mgmtd: yes
use_logd: yes
}
and even if it were, corosync's native quorum implementation (or our use of
it) was a but buggy last time i che
47 +0200
>> > Von: Jelle de Jong
>> > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
>> > Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] corosync-quorumtool configuration
>>
>> > On 27-05-11 18:19, Roman Schartlmüller wrote:
>> > > Can anybody please help me with configuration? Maybe
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, "Roman Schartlmüller" <
roman_schartlmuel...@gmx.at> wrote:
>
> Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Fri, 27 May 2011 20:30:47 +0200
> > Von: Jelle de Jong
> > An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> >
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 27 May 2011 20:30:47 +0200
> Von: Jelle de Jong
> An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] corosync-quorumtool configuration
> On 27-05-11 18:19, Roman Schartlmüller wrote:
> > Can anybody please help
On 27-05-11 18:19, Roman Schartlmüller wrote:
> Can anybody please help me with configuration? Maybe there is something
> wrong.
Maybe lose the "no-quorum-policy=ignore" options. And a html mail with
tables really :D
Kind regards,
Jelle de Jong
___
Hi,
I have Problems with corosync-quorumtool. I have set up a cluster with 2
nodes which uses corosync.
For testing purposes, I am trying to establish a quorum to the cluster,
because I want to understand the quorum-corosync tool.
I want to tag a node with 2 votes so that it can continue o
