Re: [Pacemaker] co-location of STONITH resources

2014-06-25 Thread Riccardo Murri
Hello, On 25 June 2014 18:45, Riccardo Murri wrote: > We would like to co-locate STONITH with a functional ethernet > interface on the IPMI network (`eth0.617`). So we have the following > rules:: > [...] > However, STONITH resources appear as "Stopped", and `crm_simulate` > says they cannot be

Re: [Pacemaker] co-location of STONITH resources

2014-06-25 Thread Digimer
On 25/06/14 12:45 PM, Riccardo Murri wrote: Hello, we are using IPMI to fence off nodes in the cluster (yes, we know it's a bad idea but we do not yet have proper STONITH HW so we have to sitck with it). IPMI is just fine as a fence method. It's probably the most commonly used one, actually.

[Pacemaker] co-location of STONITH resources

2014-06-25 Thread Riccardo Murri
Hello, we are using IPMI to fence off nodes in the cluster (yes, we know it's a bad idea but we do not yet have proper STONITH HW so we have to sitck with it). We would like to co-locate STONITH with a functional ethernet interface on the IPMI network (`eth0.617`). So we have the following rules