On 2013-05-10T02:18:36, John McCabe wrote:
> I ended up getting sbd up and running as an interim solution - but I'd
> really like to be able to stick with a fencing agent thats got a future in
> RHEL where possible. Is the expectation/intention that all fencing agents
> be compatible with pacemak
On 10/05/2013, at 11:18 AM, John McCabe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 08/05/2013, at 11:52 PM, John McCabe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to get fence_sanlock running as a fence
> > device within pacemaker 1.1.8 in Cen
Forgot to include my cman config...
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:18 AM, John McCabe wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
>>
>>
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 08/05/2013, at 11:52 PM, John McCabe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to get fence_sanlock running as a
> fence device within pacemaker 1.1.8 in Centos64.
> >
> > I've set the pcmk_host_argument="host_id"
>
> You
On 08/05/2013, at 11:52 PM, John McCabe wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to get fence_sanlock running as a fence
> device within pacemaker 1.1.8 in Centos64.
>
> I've set the pcmk_host_argument="host_id"
You mean the literal string "host_id" or the true value?
Might be better
Hi,
I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to get fence_sanlock running as a fence
device within pacemaker 1.1.8 in Centos64.
I've set the pcmk_host_argument="host_id" along with pcmk_host_map,
pcmk_host_list and path.
But it later complains that its unable to process the monitor operation
since no ho
