On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 3:11 AM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>
>> Wait, I think I read that wrong.
>> I would expect that no-matter what that pacemaker would exit after
>> shutdown-escalation.
>>
>> You're saying it didn't?
>> Better create a bug and attach the logs.
>
> At the time of Step4, srv03,srv
Hi Andrew,
> Wait, I think I read that wrong.
> I would expect that no-matter what that pacemaker would exit after
> shutdown-escalation.
>
> You're saying it didn't?
> Better create a bug and attach the logs.
At the time of Step4, srv03,srv04 requested a stop of the Heartbeat service.
To see
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We confirmed movement when we set freeze in no-quorum-policy.
>> In the cluster that freeze setting became effective, we stopped the service.
>>
>> However, a stop of the service took
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We confirmed movement when we set freeze in no-quorum-policy.
> In the cluster that freeze setting became effective, we stopped the service.
>
> However, a stop of the service took time very much.
>
> We set "shutdown-escalation" for five minutes
Hi,
We confirmed movement when we set freeze in no-quorum-policy.
In the cluster that freeze setting became effective, we stopped the service.
However, a stop of the service took time very much.
We set "shutdown-escalation" for five minutes to shorten the time for test.
But, a stop of the servic
