Dejan,
Well, I will got back to plan B and use the power splitter.
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:24 AM
To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC
, November 17, 2010 4:01 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:24:26 +0100
> From: Dejan Muhamedagic
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:45:01AM +0200, Chris Picton wrote:
>
>
> On 2010/11/18 1:01 AM, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> In production I am planning to have 2 separate AP7900 units each plugged
> into 2 different APC UPS units to achieve that. I would then have the
> single node name
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 05:01:20PM -0600, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:24:26 +0100
> > From: Dejan Muhamedagic
> > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> >
> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Ston
Chris,
That would be great if you could pass those on to me.
Thank you,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Chris Picton [mailto:ch...@ecntelecoms.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:45 PM
To: pacema...@clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
On 2010/11
On 2010/11/18 1:01 AM, Andrew Daugherity wrote:
In production I am planning to have 2 separate AP7900 units each plugged
into 2 different APC UPS units to achieve that. I would then have the
single node name on each, for each of the 2 PS's on the individual
systems.
...
Right, there's curren
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:24:26 +0100
> From: Dejan Muhamedagic
> To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
> Message-ID: <20101116102426.ga22...@rondo.homenet>
> Content-Type: text/p
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:41:22AM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> --On Monday, November 15, 2010 08:40:45 AM -0700 Rick Cone
> wrote:
>
> > In production I am planning to have 2 separate AP7900 units each plugged
> > into 2 different APC UPS units to achieve that. I would then have the
> > sin
Reade [mailto:g...@gno.org]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 10:41 AM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
--On Monday, November 15, 2010 08:40:45 AM -0700 Rick Cone
wrote:
> In production I am planning to have 2 separate AP7900 units each plugged
--On Monday, November 15, 2010 08:40:45 AM -0700 Rick Cone
wrote:
> In production I am planning to have 2 separate AP7900 units each plugged
> into 2 different APC UPS units to achieve that. I would then have the
> single node name on each, for each of the 2 PS's on the individual
> systems.
So
..@gno.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 9:32 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
Rick Cone wrote:
> Perhaps I'll just use 1 outlet with the node name,
> with a power splitter to the 2 redundant power supplies to reduce the
> c
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 09:32:06PM -0700, Devin Reade wrote:
> Rick Cone wrote:
>
> > Perhaps I'll just use 1 outlet with the node name,
> > with a power splitter to the 2 redundant power supplies to reduce the
> > chances of problems.
>
> IMO, if you're going to use a chassis with redundan
Rick Cone wrote:
> Perhaps I'll just use 1 outlet with the node name,
> with a power splitter to the 2 redundant power supplies to reduce the
> chances of problems.
IMO, if you're going to use a chassis with redundant power supplies,
you're better off with a system that uses an ALOM/DRAC/iLO, or
stmail.fm]
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:16 AM
> To: rc...@securepaymentsystems.com; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:35:30AM -0600, Rick Cone wrote:
> > Dejan,
> &
wer supplies to reduce the
chances of problems.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:16 AM
To: rc...@securepaymentsystems.com; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP79
On 2 November 2010 12:58, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
[...snip...]
>
> > Do you know under which conditions pacemaker initiates multiple
> connections
> > to a fencing device?
>
> There are no specific conditions. It can happen by chance because
> individual clone instances run independently.
> >
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 12:10:37PM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 2 November 2010 11:04, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > > On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dejan,
> > > >
> > > >
On 2 November 2010 11:04, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> > On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone
> wrote:
> >
> > > Dejan,
> > >
> > > Below I had:
> > >
> > > primitive res_stonith stonith:apcmastersnmp \
> > > params
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:08:32AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
> On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone wrote:
>
> > Dejan,
> >
> > Below I had:
> >
> > primitive res_stonith stonith:apcmastersnmp \
> > params ipaddr="192.1.1.109" port="161" community="sps" \
> > op start inte
On 1 November 2010 15:01, Rick Cone wrote:
> Dejan,
>
> Below I had:
>
> primitive res_stonith stonith:apcmastersnmp \
> params ipaddr="192.1.1.109" port="161" community="sps" \
> op start interval="0" timeout="60s" \
> op monitor interval="60s" timeout="60s" \
>
t look like in the crm
configure? What are the pros/cons to this compared to the clone setup I
have?
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 9:16 AM
To: rc...@securepaymentsystems.com; The Pacemaker cluste
something
like 2h or so.
> op stop interval="0" timeout="60s"
> clone rc_res_stonith res_stonith \
> meta target-role="Started"
You can also use a single instance setup, i.e. without clones.
Thanks,
Dejan
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
>
>
t="60s" \
op stop interval="0" timeout="60s"
clone rc_res_stonith res_stonith \
meta target-role="Started"
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 2:37 AM
To: &#
luster resource manager
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Stonith Device APC AP7900
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:11:03AM -0600, Rick Cone wrote:
> > I use the APC AP7900 stonith device with apcmastersnmp. It seems to works
> > well, but I see the message in logs:
24 matches
Mail list logo
