ock
Von: Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:04
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.
Thanks Andreas for your kind answer, I'll add this to my test battery.
Also, my other question,
: Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juli 2013 11:04
An: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
Betreff: Re: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.
Thanks Andreas for your kind answer, I'll add this to my test battery.
Also, my other question, is it a go
;-)
>
> ** **
>
> Best regards
>
> Andreas Mock
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com]
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 19:14
> *An:* pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> *Betreff:* [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.
monitor and stop action timeouts… ;-)
Best regards
Andreas Mock
Von: Jacobo García [mailto:jacobo.gar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013 19:14
An: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Betreff: [Pacemaker] Simulating that a node is down.
Hello,
I am looking for different
Hello,
I am looking for different ways of testing that a node is down. I am
finding a strange behavior with one of them (closing with IPtables the UDP
communication port). I would like to know if closing the port is a
recommended way of achieving my testing purposes.
Also I would like to know oth