Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-16 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-10-16T09:21:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. > You might want to trawl the raw xml to make sure pcs did the right thing. >cibadmin -Ql | grep interleave > > would tell you. "pcs resource show" actually just shows the summ

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-15 Thread Sean Lutner
On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On 10/10/2013, at 12:52 PM, Sean Lutner wrote: > >> >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Sean Lutner wrote: >> >>> >>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >>> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote: >

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-15 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 10/10/2013, at 12:52 PM, Sean Lutner wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Sean Lutner wrote: > >> >> On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: >> >>> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote: >>> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. You mi

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-09 Thread Sean Lutner
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Sean Lutner wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > >> On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote: >> >>> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. >> >> Ok, so pcs hides that (interesting to know). >> >>> Does this

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-08 Thread Sean Lutner
On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:33 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote: > >> The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. > > Ok, so pcs hides that (interesting to know). > >> Does this have an affect on what I'm trying to accomplish? > > Yes, if

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-10-08T09:29:14, Sean Lutner wrote: > The clone was created using the interleave=true option, yes. Ok, so pcs hides that (interesting to know). > Does this have an affect on what I'm trying to accomplish? Yes, if you hadn't set that, it might have been an explanation. My best guess rig

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-08 Thread Sean Lutner
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2013-10-07T11:33:28, Sean Lutner wrote: > >> Clone: EIP-AND-VARNISH-clone >> Group: EIP-AND-VARNISH >> Resource: Varnish (provider=redhat type=varnish.sh class=ocf) >>Operations: monitor interval=30s >> Resource: Varnishlog (p

Re: [Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2013-10-07T11:33:28, Sean Lutner wrote: > Clone: EIP-AND-VARNISH-clone > Group: EIP-AND-VARNISH >Resource: Varnish (provider=redhat type=varnish.sh class=ocf) > Operations: monitor interval=30s >Resource: Varnishlog (provider=redhat type=varnishlog.sh class=ocf) > Operations

[Pacemaker] Service restoration in clone resource group

2013-10-07 Thread Sean Lutner
Hello, I have a two node pacemaker + CMAN cluster on CentOS 6.4 with the configuration shown below. I'm struggling to get the resources contained in the EIP-AND-VARNISH group back online after a failover on the node that failed. I start with all varnish resources online on both nodes and the EIP