On 2013-02-06T11:24:08, Yves Trudeau wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>the site suposedly down was still able to send packet to the arbitrator.
> That caused the ballot number to be increased on the arbitrator so the valid
> ballot from the surviving site was discarded in acceptor_promise. Although
> an op
Hi Lars,
the site suposedly down was still able to send packet to the
arbitrator. That caused the ballot number to be increased on the
arbitrator so the valid ballot from the surviving site was discarded in
acceptor_promise. Although an operational mistake on my side, I wonder
if this can
On 2013-01-19T12:19:46, Yves Trudeau wrote:
> Hi,
> Forget this, everything is fine. An iptables rule was missing in my
> failure test.
Hi Yves,
which iptables rule was missing, if I may ask?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild
Hi,
Forget this, everything is fine. An iptables rule was missing in my
failure test.
Regards,
Yves
Le 2013-01-18 13:24, Yves Trudeau a écrit :
Hi,
learning about the paxos protocol, I realize the problem is not with
the arbitrator, but the surviving node. Here its debug output:
booth
Hi,
learning about the paxos protocol, I realize the problem is not with
the arbitrator, but the surviving node. Here its debug output:
booth-site[2552]: 2013/01/18_11:26:36 debug: preposer prepare ...
booth-site[2552]: 2013/01/18_11:26:36 debug: enter lease_prepare
booth-site[2552]: 2013/01
Hi,
working on a geo-redundant setup, I uncovered a problem with booth.
In order to simplify, I did an experiment with only booth, no
pacemaker. The behavior is the same with pacemaker.
Version used
git log
commit 55ab027233407fd44850f0c4905b085205d55f64
Author: Xia Li
Date
