Paul,
I am copying your message over to the Debian HA maintainers' mailing
list. Chances are that one of those guys can share some valuable insight.
Debian maintainers, when you respond would you mind copying the
Pacemaker list?
Cheers,
Florian
On 04/24/2010 06:01 AM, Paul Gear wrote:
> Hi folk
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Paul Gear wrote:
On 24/04/10 15:05, Quentin Smith wrote:
Hi Paul,
Current clvm actually supports multiple locking schemes, including both
the old redhat cluster stack and modern corosync/openais. We use Ubuntu
Hardy with backported corosync and clvm packages, and it works
On 24/04/10 15:05, Quentin Smith wrote:
Hi Paul,
Current clvm actually supports multiple locking schemes, including both
the old redhat cluster stack and modern corosync/openais. We use Ubuntu
Hardy with backported corosync and clvm packages, and it works pretty
well. Hand-backporting is not for
Hi Paul,
Current clvm actually supports multiple locking schemes, including both
the old redhat cluster stack and modern corosync/openais. We use Ubuntu
Hardy with backported corosync and clvm packages, and it works pretty
well. Hand-backporting is not for the faint of heart, though.
--Quent
Hi folks,
Over the last several days i've been reading, asking questions (special
thanks to beekhof, tserong, fghass and the other kind folks on #linux-ha
putting up with my questions), and experimenting with my test setup, and
i'm yet to find a viable combination of options for creating a VM
