Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-27 Thread Takenaka Kazuhiro
Hi, Priyanka > I understand your point but if we have SCSI3 protection other node will have > to perform few extra steps before accessing the disk. it will have to remove > to the present key, put it's new registration key , then put it's own > reservation then only it can go ahead and access the

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-24 Thread Priyanka Ranjan
> sfex actually depends on the contraints from pacemaker to ensure the > data integrity, > and LVM doesn't secure data integrity until clustered locking is enabled. can you explain bit more about the constraints and how can we enable cluster locking > can we configure present scsi2reservation R

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-24 Thread Xinwei Hu
Here's the attachment... Sorry for push the "sending" button too early. 2009/2/24 Xinwei Hu : > Hi Priyanka, > > 2009/2/22 Priyanka Ranjan : >>> It is close to impossible to protect against malicious applications from >>> other cluster nodes. sfex, LVM exclusive activation, and SCSI2/SCSI3 >>> res

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-24 Thread Xinwei Hu
Hi Priyanka, 2009/2/22 Priyanka Ranjan : >> It is close to impossible to protect against malicious applications from >> other cluster nodes. sfex, LVM exclusive activation, and SCSI2/SCSI3 >> reservations likewise can be broken - they must be able to be broken, or >> else the cluster could never o

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-21 Thread Priyanka Ranjan
> > It is close to impossible to protect against malicious applications from > other cluster nodes. sfex, LVM exclusive activation, and SCSI2/SCSI3 > reservations likewise can be broken - they must be able to be broken, or > else the cluster could never orchestrate a fail-over. I understand your

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-21 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2009-02-20T21:07:51, Priyanka Ranjan wrote: > can we create volumegroup or filesystem on this sfex device. i tried but > the sfex daemon failed No. But what you can do is to use one partition as a "lock" and make the other resources depend on it. > other thing i would like to ask is i under

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-20 Thread Priyanka Ranjan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo < nakah...@intellilink.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, Ranjan > > > > > > name="device" value="/dev/sde"/> > > > > The "device" attribute value must be sfex partition name > like a "/dev/sde1". That is not device name like a "/dev/sde". > Thanks Nakah

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-19 Thread NAKAHIRA Kazutomo
Hi, Ranjan > > name="device" value="/dev/sde"/> > The "device" attribute value must be sfex partition name like a "/dev/sde1". That is not device name like a "/dev/sde". Still, if it doesn't solve the problem, then please report the result of hb_report. Best Regards, NAKAHIRA Kazutomo L

Re: [Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-19 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2009-02-19T16:42:51, Priyanka Ranjan wrote: > > i am not able to start this resource . it is failing due to unknown error. > > can anyone help me here in debugging . following is the error message. > > > > primitive_sfex_start_0 (node=node1, call=11, rc=1, status=0): unknown error Try lookin

[Pacemaker] SFEX resource agent

2009-02-19 Thread Priyanka Ranjan
Hi All, > i am trying to use SFEX first time. i have used *http://linux-ha.org/sfex > *as a reference. i have added a SFEX resource through gui. following is > the cib.xml content. > > type="sfex"> > >name="target- > role" value="started"/> > > >n